~donna tartt~ the secret history

tshRead it in: a week, or thereabouts

This is a possible candidate for Book of the Year.  I can’t believe I didn’t read it before now.  It was one of those rare works that you are actually sorry to finish, because you can’t bear to be cut out of that literary world.

Yes, it was amazing.  It had an interesting plot, and it grabbed you from the start.  It had amazing characters, who were human in so many ways and incredibly interesting.  It talked philosophy, it talked culture, it talked life and love.  It made sense and it made me see everything in a different light.  Ah, to have time to read it again!  I immediately recommended it to my mother (who is the pickiest person I know in the books she reads).

It is about a group of university students who all study Ancient Greek.  This is a selective class that only takes about five students.  Accordingly, the students are a tight bunch and very secretive, literally cut off from the rest of the campus.  Their tutor is Julian, a sort of genius and worshiped by the students.  Together, they commit a murder.

Because it focuses on such a small group of people, the characterisation in this book is amazing.  We get to know every character so well, we feel we could recognise them in real life.  And each personality is so interesting, with all their little flaws, with their nervous habits, their irks and downfalls.  We get to know the main character, Richard Papen, and we grow to love him, to feel his sorrows and his joys.  This is the point of first-person perspective, and Tartt does it so well!

It is the ‘original American campus novel’, but I wish my university life was like this!  It’s the ideal life, and it’s the nightmarish life.  The characters spend their time discussing philosophy, life and death, everything that is important and warrants discussion, but then the things they do are horrible and terrible and you realise, for all their discussion of philosophy and life and death, they don’t really think and appreciate the same things that normal people do.  Their morals are chilling.

This book strikes at the heart of what it means of be human and what it means to be alive.  It talks about freedom, about intelligence, about violence.

But how glorious to release [these destructive passions] in a single burst!  To sing, to scream, to dance barefoot in the woods in the dead of night, with no more awareness of mortality than an animal!  These are powerful mysteries. (pg 45)

We hang off the importance of these words and what they mean.  Throughout the book, raucous campus students throw out-of-control parties, but the true enjoyment rests with the group of Ancient Greek students, who search for ways to truly lose control, and who commit horrid acts, then justify them without a qualm.

‘But how,’ said Charles, who was close to tears, ‘how can you possibly justify cold-blooded murder?’
Henry lit a cigarette. ‘I prefer to think of it,’ he had said, ‘as redistribution of matter.’ (pg 339)

It ends but you want it to continue.  You want to follow the characters further.  I think this is one of those novels that people could write sequel and sequel to, imagining the characters meeting again and again in different situations, imagining things forever and ever.  That is the result of true, masterful characterisation.  I don’t really have very much more to say about it.  I’m sort of left speechless.  And, seeing another one of Donna Tartt’s novels in a bookstore, I immediately bought it (even if it was $32.00, oh my poor, empty bank account!).

Read it if you: like any sort of philosophy, Greek literature, ancient history, student life, skewed morals… basically, if you can read.

While reading, listen to: Damien Jurado Maraqopa (I feel this song has something distinctly American about it), Smetana Die Moldau, Chopin Nocturne in C Sharp Minor, Dvorak Violin Concerto Romance

~patrick suskind~ perfume

per Read it in: three days (it’s holidays again)

I’ve been wanting to read this book for a while.  I know I say this about a lot of books, but this was especially true for this one.  The concept never really appealed to me (a book about perfumes and smell… what on earth? I thought) but in high school English class we once read an excerpt from the first couple of pages which described in incredible detail the streets of Paris during the late 1700s.  It went something like this:

In the period of which we speak, there reigned in the cities a stench barely conceivable to us modern men and women.  The streets stank of manure, the courtyards of urine, the stairwells stank of mouldering wood and rat droppings, the kitchens of spoiled cabbage and mutton fat; the unaired parlours stank of stale dust, the bedrooms of greasy sheets, damp featherbeds, and the pungently sweet aroma of chamber-pots.  The stench of sulphur rose from the chimneys, the stench of caustic lyes from the tanneries, and from the slaughterhouses came the stench of congealed blood.  People stank of sweat and unwashed clothes; from their mouths came the stench of rotting teeth, from their bellies that of onions, and from their bodies, if they were no longer very young, came the stench of rancid cheese and sour milk and tumorous disease…  The peasant stank as did the priest, the apprentice as did his master’s wife, the whole of the aristocracy stank, even the King himself stank, stank like a rank lion, and the Queen like an old goat, summer and winter.  For in the eighteenth century there was nothing to hinder bacteria busy at decomposition, and so there was no human activity, either constructive or destructive, no manifestation of germinating or decaying life, that was not accompanied by stench.’ (pg 3-4)

I do love a bit of description.  I love it a lot.  And I did love this book quite a bit.  The only thing that irritated me slightly per2was the cover.  Actually, this irritated me a lot.  The cover I’ve chosen to put up the top here is not the cover of the book that I read.  Rather, this one right here is.  Look at it.  It is a romance novel cover.  The person who designed this cover was a romance cover designer who couldn’t think of anything else to put on a book about fragrance and perfume.  Try some perfume bottles next time or, like the cover above, somebody’s nose.  Yes, the book includes some very important red-headed girls, however in no part of the book are they lying around under bedsheets looking like back-alley whores.  In fact, strange as it may see with a cover like this, this book is not about sex.  For most of this book, there is no sex, and when there is sex the main character is not involved… as such.  But, for reasons unknown to me, I had to brave public transport for three days reading a book that looked like this and trying not to be judged by people.  Oh the shame!

Alright, now that I’ve got that off my chest, I may as well talk about what is beyond the cover.  You can’t judge a book by it’s cover, after all, though I certainly would have if I was riding public transport with myself during this time.  Okay, that’s enough now.  This book is about a young man, Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, who has this superhuman sense of smell, meaning that he can pick up the scents of things that we wouldn’t usually consider having a scent.  Like rocks.  He can smell rocks.  And red-headed virgins.  He can smell red-headed virgins from miles away.  He meanders his way through life in various classes of society; he goes from an orphan to a lowly tanner’s assistant to a perfumer’s assistant, to a cave-man-esque hermit, to a man of high standing within his village, to the self-professed ‘Grenouille the Great’.  We see his entire life unfold, right from his birth until his death.  It is quite a momentous work, especially given that it’s able to fit all that into less than three hundred pages without skipping over the years in an irritating manner.  It even includes vast tracts of philosophical thought on life, giving the reader a map of the brain de la Grenouille.

One of the interesting things about this book is that the main character is almost an anti-hero, and in some ways he isn’t the main character at all.  There were definitely parts of the book where we detached from him and our omniscient narrator told us about the activities of other characters in a way that excluded our protagonist completely.  It felt as if I was hearing the story from a witness of certain events who did not know the truth behind them and the way that they secretly involved our main character.  It was interesting, I have to tell you that.

I’m not even sure I liked Grenouille, to tell the truth.  And that makes for an interesting read.  Although I didn’t necessarily like him, his exploits were definitely interesting, yet it was the detachment from emotion at his triumphs and failures that surprised me.  I wouldn’t have cheered for him, if I’d met him in real life I definitely would have avoided him, and the fact that he was the protagonist didn’t stop me from being a little disgusted by some of the things he did (if not all the things that he did).  It’s not a book that you read because the characters are likeable.  You read it because the characters are intriguing and they carry the plot.

There is also, now that I think about it, a sense of inevitability, of fate, in this book.  Perhaps it is the way that it starts right from the very beginning, from Grenouille’s birth, leading to the assumption that it will lead on until his death.  Or perhaps it was the setting – the unforgivable eighteenth century in which nobody really lived very long at all.  Maybe it was his exploits, which you knew would reap some sort of a consequence in the end, which you were just waiting for throughout the whole novel, knowing that things could not go on as they were forever.

In this way, the final scene didn’t surprise me, but then it did.  It was horrible, but unassumingly horrible.  A writer with the sort of descriptive tools that had been used throughout the book didn’t pull them out in this final scene, but left it as is.  In some ways, it’s more shocking that way.  But you will have to read it and tell me what you think.  I won’t say anymore.

Read it if you: are interested in the historical setting, like descriptive passages, like reading the cognitive musings of characters

While reading listen to: Lucia Popp Depuis le jour, Dvorak New World Symphony Movement I, Ravel Gaspard de la Nuit

~leo tolstoy~ anna karenina

AKRead it in: around two months

My first Tolstoy!  I’m so proud.  Of course, probably like many others, I was inspired to read this by the film that came out at the start of this year.  A lot of people are saying “oh yes, Keira Knightley, could do better, blah blah”, but really, to me that film was a masterpiece.  And it had Aaron Taylor-Johnson in it, which is is one tall, dark and very handsome reason to see it.

I also felt quite attracted to Tolstoy’s way of thinking.  I was really into simplistic living, in the sense that working hard and living only on what was needed was the way to achieve happiness.  Hence I was very interested in the portion of the book focusing on Levin, who was supposed to be a mirror for Tolstoy himself.

Anyway, so I’m not sure there’s much point detailing the plot, but I will anyway.  Just the bare bones.  Anna has a nice life with her husband, who is a very important statesman in Russia.  Then she falls in love unexpectedly with this handsome young thing, Vronsky.  Their affair shocks the nation completely and drives all three of them – husband, wife and lover – to despair.  Meanwhile, there is the story of Levin who lives in the countryside managing his land and falling hopelessly in love with young, pretty ladies named Kitty.  One story has a happy ending, the other doesn’t.  Ten points for whoever can guess which one.

So, I’m a sucker for descriptions, and Tolstoy gave it to me.  I mean, Levin farming his land during the spring, that’s bound to have a nice description or two… or twenty.  It was great.  Here’s one (not of the farming):

It was already quite dark, and in the south, where he was looking, there were no clouds.  The clouds stood on the opposite side.  From there came flashes of lightning and the roll of distant thunder.  Levin listened to the drops monotonously dripping from the lindens in the garden and looked at the familiar triangle of stars and the branching Milky Way passing through it.  At each flash of lightning, not only the Milky Way but the bright stars also disappeared, but as soon as the lightning died out they reappeared in the same places, as if thrown by some unerring hand (page 815).

And then, the other thing I love, the degradation of the human soul.  Plenty of that too.  Just look at this fantastic sentence describing Karenin (Anna’s husband):

He felt that he could not maintain himself against the general pressure of contempt and callousness that he saw clearly in the face of this assistance, and of Kornei, and of everyone without exception that he had met in those two days.  He felt that he could not divert people’s hatred from himself, because the reason for that hatred was not that he was bad (then he could have tried to be better), but that he was shamefully and repulsively unhappy.  For that … they would be merciless towards him; people would destroy him, as dogs kill a wounded dog howling with pain (page 506).

It was long, very long (800 pages), which is why it took me around two months to finish, but I did enjoy it immensely.  Like many long books, reading it was a journey, and finishing it was like being outcast from an entire world.  I missed the busy streets of Moscow and the beauty of the countryside, I missed Russia even though I’d never been there.

Read it if you: want to go to Russia, are interested in the society of the time and the way that it works, like tales of a person’s social standing being completely destroyed, are interested in reading Tolstoy.

While reading, listen to: Piano Concerto No. 2 Rachmaninoff (yes, that’s right, the whole thing, right to the end), The Golden Spinning Wheel Antonin Dvorak

Blog at WordPress.com.